On Viewing EdTech with a Critical Eye

In Week 14 of this course, we were introduced to two leaders in EdTech who are notorious for the way they view the EdTech field, tools, changes, and hyped-up-magic-bullet-education-solutions with a critical eye. I appreciate that Audrey Watters is skeptical about “Big EdTech” and all the money and data collection behind it. I like that Audrey challenges the super hype around all things tech in education, but feel I lean a bit more towards the more mildly skeptical Larry Cuban, who seems to see that tech in schools could be moving towards the positive.
Overall, I agree with taking a step back and looking at a resource or strategy critically before preaching about how successful and wonderful it is or will be. A point that has been pulled out of the Cuban post by many of my classmates, and a topic which was repeated throughout my Master’s program, was the concept of using technology with purposeful intent. As Larry mentioned in a 2014 blog post, “…access does not dictate use…”. Just because schools are increasing equity in access to devices, does not mean that these devices are being used to change the way students are learning. It does not mean that students have equitable access to a teacher who is skilled with integrating this technology into the background of their teaching. In a more recent interview with Larry, he mentioned seeing some positive changes towards technology use in the background of classrooms rather than the foreground, putting the learning first and the device just happens to be a tool to access that learning.
With all these devices in schools, if teachers aren’t provided with opportunities to expand their skills and ideas for how to use technology with purpose and intent in the classroom, then the learning is not going to reach this “transformative” level that is constantly mentioned in the EdTech space. Technology is great but only if we take the time to research and test out which devices, apps, and digital resources are worth our money. We need to think critically about what data we give away to those “free” resources. And we need to ensure we allocate enough funding and time to providing teachers with consistent training, helping them utilize this tech to facilitate the personalized and inquiry-based learning we expect in our 21st-century schools.

